By Phillip B Gottfredson
As Americans, and citizens of Utah, when we look back on our history we want to find the heroes and stories of our ancestors that are inspiring. But the Mormon's Black Hawk War in Utah was brutal and bloody, one of the most inhumane wars in American history. The harsh realities of any war are often interred in the bones of it's victims to be forgotten. But, the Black Hawk War, lasting some four years from 1865-69, was the consequence of 20 long and agonizing years of Mormon depredations of Utah's Native peoples beginning 1849. The psychological shock and severe distress spanning more than two decades was for the Native peoples of Utah far outside their usual range of experience. So it followed, that the severity of the trauma experienced was beyond any man's ability to cope, war with the Mormons was for the Timpanogos Tribe their last hope for survival. The senseless deaths of thousands of Utah's Natives peoples men, woman and children, who's only crime was being Native to the Americas was a horrific tragedy that has been forever indelibly etched upon the minds and hearts of their descendents never to be forgotten. In contrast, today, only a tiny percentage of Utah's population has heard of the Black Hawk War and know virtually nothing of it's Native inhabitants.
The Timpanogos Tribe of the Snake-Shoshone had inhabited Utah territory for many centuries and were in sharp disagreement with Mormon settlers colonizing their ancestral homeland from the very beginning. Timpanogos leader Wakara told interpreter M. S. Martenas In 1853 "He (Walkara) said that he had always been opposed to the whites set[t]ling on the Indian lands, particularly that portion which he claims; and on which his band resides and on which they have resided since his childhood, and his parents before him—that the Mormons when they first commenced the settlement of Salt Lake Valley, was friendly, and promised them many comforts, and lasting friendship—that they continued friendly for a short time, until they became strong in numbers, then their conduct and treatment towards the Indians changed—they were not only treated unkindly, but many were much abused and this course has been pursued up to the present—sometimes they have been treated with much severity—they have been driven by this population from place to place—settlements have been made on all their hunting grounds in the valleys, and the graves of their fathers have been torn up by the whites." - STATEMENT, M. S. MARTENAS, INTERPRETER Great Salt Lake City, July 6 1853 Brigham Young Papers, MS 1234, Box 58, Folder 14 LDS Archives - Will Bagley Transcription
When Mormon settlers arrived in the ancestral land of the Timpanogos in Utah territory, which bordered the northern section of Mexico in 1847, the Timpanogos Tribe was the first Brigham Young and his followers encountered. Their population may have been 70,000 or more. They were the ruling Tribe that occupied the entire territory comprised of some 180,000 square miles. The Timpanogos, as they were called by early trappers, were all one people before the Mormons came, but as Mormon's began killing them - terrified they scattered every direction seeking protection. "In the Hildago Treaty of 1848 the United States agreed to recognize Indian land holdings, and to allow Indian people to continue their customs and languages." Settlers ignored the treaty with impunity. (See The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo)
Details of the Black Hawk War in Utah are to be found at the end of this introduction. But first it is important to address the confusion that persists regarding two Tribes that occupy the Uinta Valley Reservation in Utah today namely the Ute and the Snake-Shoshone Timpanogos Tribes. Writers of Utah's Indian history would have us believe that the Ute and Timpanogos are the same Tribe, but they are not. Both are uniquely different in language and origin.
Tribal identity is absolutely crucial in our understanding of the Black Hawk War in Utah, yet it remains the least understood topic causing inaccuracies in our histories leading to baseless conclusions and false assumptions. Historians mistakenly identify the Snake-Shoshone Timpanogos Tribe as being Ute. This is a common mistake most all historian's have made. The Utes during the time of the Black Hawk War occupied their ancestural land in Colorado, and it was not until the Removal Act of 1881, following the Meeker Massacre, eleven years after the Black Hawk War ended, when the Colorado Utes were forced on to the Uinta Valley Reservation in Utah that had been set aside by President Abraham Lincoln for the "Indians of Utah," namely the Timpanogos, on October 3, 1861.
It was European migrants and trappers who coined the slang term "Ute" which doesn't appear in history until about 1865, and began as a pseudonym of an Shoshonian Indian word u-tah-ats referring to all Indians that occupied Utah Valley. During the 1800's the word 'Ute' had nothing to do with tribal affiliation, rather geographical location. The word 'Ute' in time was extended by Europeans to include the greater part of the Indians of Utah and Colorado, resulting in much confusion regarding Tribal affiliation. The word "Timpanogostzis" is Snake-Shoshonian, and the Timpanogos occupied Utah Territory were referred to as the "Uintahs," "Uintah-ats," and the "Utahs," and in all cases are in fact the Snake-Shoshone Timpanogos. The Ute Tribe, as we know them today, was not formed until 1937 comprised of the seven bands of the Colorado the Yamparicas (aka Yampas, and Whiterivers), Uinta (not to be confused with the Snake-Shoshoni Uintahs), Capote, Weeminuche, Moache, Parianuche (aka Grand Rivers), and Tabaquache (aka Uncompahgre), none of which are Snake-Shoshone Timpanogos Indians, and each having their own unique dialects. Utes today prefer to call themselves 'Nuche' as the word "Ute" is not in their language. And "Timpanogostzis" in not in their language. The Colorado Indians and Timpanogos are distinctly different in origin, language and customs. (Source: Timpanogos Tribe, Ute Tribe, Commission of Indian Affairs Annual Report 1865, O.H. Irish, Powell, and Department of the Interior.)
Treaties are an important source of information regarding Tribal affiliation, they reveal not only the political nature of the conflicts and the ambitions of early settlers to bring the Native peoples into submission and give up their land, treaties also reveal the Tribes and leaders who were most involved and prominent in the conflicts. For example, in a failed attempt to bring an end to the Black Hawk War that was raging in all directions, Congress authorized Treaty Negotiations for the Indians of Utah Territory, and on June 8, 1865 the Spanish Fork Treaty was negotiated exclusively with the various bands of the Timpanogos Tribe. However, the treaty would fail ratification as it bore the signature of Brigham Young, thus leaving intact the Uinta Valley Reservation. Congress declared "rather than associate with Brigham Young on such an occasion, they would have the negotiations fail; they would rather the Indians, than the Mormons, would have the land."
The significance of this treaty is that it was intended for the Timpanogos Tribe living on the Uinta Valley Reservation, whereas none of the seven Tribes of Colorado known today as "Ute" were named. One exception was the Yampa who were named but any claim they may have had was relinquished by them in the Confederated Utes treaty of 1868.
The Timpanogos Tribe was under the leadership of seven brothers namely Sanpitch, Walkara, Arropeen, Tabby, Ammon, Sowiette, Grospeen and eventually Black Hawk who was the son of Sanpitch. These seven legendary leaders were sons of Moonch, who was the son of Turunianchi, and were referred to as "the privileged blood." They ruled every Eutah clan and village along the Wasatch. (See Black Hawk War Facts)
In the Dominguez Escalante Journal: Their Expedition Through Colorado Utah Arizona and New Mexico in 1776, Escalante describes having come in contact with aboriginal peoples who were Snake-Shoshoni who called themselves "Timpanogostzis," an Aztecan-Shoshonian word meaning People of the Rock, whose leader was Turunianchi, who occupied a land that is now known as Utah. Dominguez named Mount Timpanogos, Timpanogos River (Provo River), Timpanogos Lake (Great Salt Lake) and Timpanogos Valley (Utah Valley) in honor of these people, an honor that remains to this day. Government maps that predate Mormon settlement support this fact. Then in 1824, explorer Etienne Provost entered what is now Utah and reported having come in contact with a Snake-Shoshone Tribe (Timpanogos) living along the Timpanogos River (Provo River) and Timpanogos Lake. Provo City derives it's name from this early explorer.
My great-grandfather Peter Gottfredson, an emigrant from Denmark arrived in Utah territory in 1857 and lived among the Timpanogos during the war. Peter clearly points out in his book Indian Depredations in Utah that the Snake Shoshoni Timpanogos Tribe ruled the entire territory of Utah. Peter wrote: "It was with reluctance that the Timpanogos Indians who met the Higbee colony in March, 1848, permitted the first white settlement on Provo River, and that, too, in spite of the invitation previously extended to the colonists by the Chiefs, Sowiette and Walker, to settle among their tribes and teach them how to become civilized." - Peter Gottfredson/Indian Depredations in Utah
The Timpanogos Tribe, with it's nearly 1000 members still, to this day, occupy their ancient homeland, homeland that was theirs long before the Uinta Valley Reservation was conceived, yet even this is a little known and ignored fact. The reservation is but a tiny remnant of a once vast territory they call the "home of their ancestors."
The exact origins of the Shoshone has been lost to time. Moreover, Oregon scholars have documented the Shoshone have occupied Oregon territory for some 20,000 years. The Shoshone eventually spread into areas we know today as Montana, Idaho, Nevada, and Utah. They continued to explore areas as far south as Mexico and Guatemala having come in contact with the Mayan. According to Maya and North American Indian scholars I interviewed, these ancient explorers returned to North America bringing with them sacred wisdom, dialects, and traditions of the southern regions. I am witness to the fact today the most sacred ceremonies of the the North American Indians many are in ways similar to the Maya, and a prominent tribe in Arizona, I am told, actually speak Mayan in one of their ceremonies. Symbols found in pictographs in North America are recognized and regarded sacred by Maya peoples.
The Shoshone were first called the Chickimec (the Dog People) then there were three divisions, the Chickimec became the Nokoni, the Aztec, and Hopi (Moki). The Nokoni became the Shoshoni Nation which split into four bands, the Snake, Bannock, Comanche and Paiute. The Timpanogos descend from the Snake-Shoshone. Early explorers referred to the Timpanogos as the Eutahs. The term "Eutah" derives from an Arapaho word E-wu-ha-wu-si meaning "people who use grass or bark for their lodges." All Indians living in grass lodges or bark structures would fall into this category. The shortened version Ewuha or Eutah are terms spoken by early trappers and explorers who traveled the Utah area when referring to the Native peoples they encountered who spoke the Snake-Shoshone language.
The Timpanogos were deeply connected to the land of their ancestors. They were deeply connected to the beauty that surrounded them, majestic mountains, lakes and streams. They were deeply connected to the plants in all their endless forms and uses. They were deeply connected to maintaining a harmonious relationship with the animals and all living things. They understood and respected these things as sacred gifts from a greater power. They were neither "savage" nor "heathens" rather a prosperous, and deeply spiritual civilization. For the Timpanogos the war was never about possessions, the land was their mother, nourishing all her children, it belonged to everyone. It was about honor, honoring the sacred. To this I further say if you must judge them, do so by their own standards.
Shoshone communities were based upon true democracy. Protocols and ethics are religiously followed. No one person was above all others. Every individual was respected equally. Family and community were inseparable and cohesively bound together in an environment of Honesty, Love, Courage, Truth, Wisdom, Humility, and Respect. Even animals and all things Creator created were seen by Native peoples as having a purpose, and each possessing special gifts and talents. When decisions were made within Native communities everyone had to be in agreement before action was taken. Within the communities each family took on particular roles, for example medicine people, warriors, weavers, hunters and gatherers etc. were the responsibility of individual families respectfully. Elders, who were the old and wise, they had the greatest influence in the community. They were the spokespersons, teachers and keepers of wisdom.
In my quest to learn the truth regarding the war, I devoted all my time over the past decade and half researching the Black Hawk War in Utah. I soon grew wary of Mormon scholars and writers who have published one-sided accounts for over a century and half. I became suspicious of what they wrote of the Indians which is often scant, brief and disingenuous. They did not ask or care what the Indians they studied had to say about their work, nor did they ask how they would analyze, interpret, or if they had their own version of the particular story they were writing about. I learned that Tribal leaders have invited historians to discuss their version of the story to no avail. Accounts filled with omissions, ambiguities and half-truths have become standard. "Tell a lie often enough and it becomes the truth" and Utah's history is replete with inaccuracies. Moreover, the lack of transparency regarding the thousands of Indian lives that were lost in the Black Hawk War demonstrates contempt for true Indian history which has been Utah's record over the past century and half.
The deeper I delved into Utah's history regarding the war the more confusing the story became. Things just didn't make sense as there are so many contradictions and versions of the story. It became apparent that if I was going to connect the dots I had to look in places no one else has looked. I spent years interviewing the living descendants of those who's ancestors wrote firsthand accounts of the war. I visited every town throughout southern Utah where the conflicts occurred digging into the histories found there, finding missing bits and pieces that are not to be found in mainstream-history. I visited virtually every site where battles took place and stood in reverence on sacred ground once soaked with the blood of Native peoples, who's only crime was that they were Indian. And as I became immersed in the Indian culture a very different story began to emerge from beneath the sugar-coated veneer of the victors accounts. An inglorious story, abundant with extreme and shameful cruelty of man's inhumanity to man.
The Black Hawk War was not a single event. I have documented over 150 bloody confrontations with Mormon settlers led by Brigham Young. The first of six massacres of the Timpanogos commenced at Battle Creek in 1849, and the bloodshed continued on into the year 1870. While historians focus on the years 1865-68 when Sanpitch's son Black Hawk launched his 14 month counteroffensive as being the time of the war. And some historians try to make the case that the 22 years leading up to the war were "complex," A member of the Timpanogos Tribe asked the question, "What choice were we given? To walk knee deep in the blood of our people, or give up our sacred land and culture and accept whiteman's ways... it was a matter of honor and survival, why is that so complicated to understand?"
Black Hawk passed over in 1870 from being shot with a rifle while in battle attempting to rescue a fellow warrior at Gravely Ford June 10th, 1866. Complications developed from his wound causing his death in 1870. By 1870 when Black Hawk died, the Timpanogos population had decreased by a staggering 90% and more from violence, disease, and starvation. Just 1500 Timpanogos Indians remained alive when they were forced onto the Uinta Valley Reservation making them dependent upon the Church and United States government for food and shelter, and in the first winter more died from starvation because food supplies LDS Church leader and Indian Agent Brigham Young promised them - never arrived. As victims of genocide Native peoples of Utah territory were subjected to deceit, torture, mass butchery, rape, and death, death to others animals and plants, to the waters and the land; men, women and children were left to wonder demoralized and dehumanized in a land they believed belonged to them for eternity, a people who in their final agony cried out "we are human too."
It is troubling that genocide, ethnic cleansing, taking land from the Snake-Shoshoni Timpanogos Tribe, and Black Hawk's remains being put on public display, is seen as amusing and trivial in Mormon accounts. The time has come where Native peoples of Utah need to tell their story and demand it be told accurately. History of the Native peoples of Utah does not end with the conquest. Native peoples are not simply the degenerate descendants of a fabulous civilization, as we are often led to believe.
Being a great-grandson of Peter Gottfredson, author of one of the oldest and highly cited firsthand accounts of the Black Hawk war... the book Indian Depredations in Utah, I respectfully honor and admire the friendship that Peter had with Black Hawk and the Timpanogos during and following the War. It was grandpa's book that ignited my interest in the War, and the need for me to know what his experience was like living among the Indian peoples. That led me on a life changing journey, and today, like my great-grandfather, I too live among the Timpanogos Tribe, learning firsthand of their life-ways and the tragic consequences and legacy of the war.
Sixty years have passed and the images are still vivid in my mind, the glass case, the dried decayed remains of a man in the case. father whispering to me "that's Black Hawk." It was a strange and eerie feeling for an eleven year old. I think it was the first time I had ever seen a decomposed human corpse, And that this display was in a small relic hall on Temple Square in downtown Salt Lake City didn't have any significance to me. That was the first time I learned about Timpanogos Chief Black Hawk. I also remember father telling me when he first saw Black Hawk's remains, the Timpanogos Chief was on display in the window of a hardware store in Spanish Fork, that was after members of the Mormon Church had robbed his grave in 1919. Father was about the same age as me then, eleven or so.
I am not a spokesperson for Native American Indians, any group or organization. I began researching the history of the war on my own in 1990. My extraordinary journey into the indigenous world began in Washington DC at the Grand Opening of the National Museum of the American Indian in 2004. It followed that the past decade would be a time of great honor and privilege for me to experience. I'm grateful to the Snake-Shoshoni Timpanogos Tribe, Shoshone, Lakota, Makaw, Siletz, Choctaw, Apache, Maya, Washoe, Paiute, Goshute, Pahvant, Colorado Utes, Hopi, Pueblo, and Dine' Navajo, and many more for sharing with me their version and interpretation of Christendom's arrival in the
Americas. Don't think this to be a small matter reader. "No one has ever asked us," was their reply when I inquired "why have you never told your side of the story?" And I will bear witness to the fact that Native Indian peoples of Utah many live in absolute fear of Mormon vengeance to this day should they tell their side of the story. Whether their perception is true or not it is a testament to the extreme trauma Utah's Native Indian peoples have experienced that needs to be acknowledged, and remembered regardless of what happened, and never forgotten. (Phillip B Gottfredson - Recipient of Indigenous-Day Award)
(Comments or questions visit us on Facebook)
(See Legacy Of The Black Hawk War)
(See Source Material)
(See Timeline for more details and site navigation)
(See The Black Hawk War: Utah's Forgotten Tragedy Video)
(Current events regarding the Standing Rock Sioux visit Phillip B Gottfredson's Group on Facebook)
History Of The Black Hawk War
The Black Hawk War in Utah it was not a single event. There are some 150 bloody confrontations on record between the Mormons, U.S. Government and the Timpanogos Indian Nation between the years 1849-70. It is described by historian Will Bagley as "the frontier at it's very worst." The following is a brief synopsis with links to first-hand accounts, documents, and commentary within this website. Also see my Timeline of the Black Hawk War.
"We took from them almost all their land—the reservations are just a tiny remnant of traditional tribal homelands. We tried to take from them their hunting rights, their fishing rights, the timber on their land. We tried to take from them their water rights. We tried to take from them their culture, their religion, their identity, and perhaps most importantly, we tried to take from them their freedom. And what is so amazing about this whole story is that we failed. We failed after hundreds of years of trying to take everything from American Indians. We failed to do that. They're still here and there's survival; that great saga of survival is one of the great stories of all mankind." - Dr. Daniel McCool University of Utah
"Treat them kindly, and treat them as Indians, and not as your equals."
"...it's very difficult to deal with what is truly a series of small atrocities. A border war. A war between neighbors and people who'd lived with each other and knew each other very well. A war between young men who'd grown up with a lot of Indian friends or a lot of Mormon friends, and that's what makes this history so painful that's why the Black Hawk war is so difficult for both Indians and Mormons to remember." - Historian Will Bagley
Mormon leader Brigham Young famously said "It's CHEAPER to feed them than to fight them." One can only imagine the cost of feeding some 70,000 people. He also told the Denver Rocky Mountain News paper "you can get rid of more Indians with a sack of flour than a keg of powder." He repeatedly admonished his followers to "Treat them kindly, and treat them as Indians, and not as your equals." (See Brigham Young Discourses)
How much Brigham Young spent on 'flour' for Indians is anyone's guess, but the costs of doing war is clearly spelled out in a 250 page document titled "Memorial of the Legislative Assembly of Utah" which was prepared by the Legislature of
Utah in 1873 and sent to the United States Congress. It is a bill which Congress awarded reimbursement of one and a half million dollars for expenses incurred by
Brigham Young's private militia, the Nauvoo Legion, for removal of the
Indian population in Utah territory between the years 1865 and 1873. Putting that into perspective, a million and half dollars in 1873 would be somewhere around $32 million today.
"Now, Brigham Young officially proclaimed a policy of helping the Indians. But at the same time the Mormons are aggressively seizing every water hole, using up the game and the timber resources." - Historian Will Bagley
Complicating matters more, the Mormon church
believed they had a divine obligation to convert Utah's American
Indians to Mormonism, according to church doctrine, and in so doing
the so-called "loathsome" Indians would become a "white and delightsome people" and would be forgiven of the sins of
their forefathers. (Book of Mormon 2 Nephi 5:21-23) According
to church doctrine, the nature of the dark skin was a curse, the
cause was the Lord, the reason was because the Lamanites (Indians) "had
hardened their hearts against him, (God)" and the punishment was
to make them "loathsome" unto God's people who had white skins.
Meanwhile, during the 1850-60's when the Timpanogos refused to assimilate into Mormon
culture, the Mormons’ response was to 'get rid' of them. What choice were the Timpanogos given when confronted with a Book of Mormon in one hand, and a gun in the other? (See Doctrine of Discovery)
The underlying cause of the Christian mind-set begins before Columbus arrived in the Americas, Christian Monarchs decreed that anyone who did not believe in the God of the Bible, or that Jesus Christ was the true Messiah, were deemed "heathens," "infidels" and "savages". Christians were then entitled to commit all manner of depredations upon them. Indeed America was founded upon Christian principals; there was no separation of church and state by those who drew their power from Old Testament-inspired Manifest Destiny, saying: "This is the land promised by the Eternal Father to the Faithful, since we are commanded by God in the Holy Scriptures to take it from them, being idolaters, by reason of their idolatry and sin, to put them all to the knife, leaving no living thing save maidens and children, their cities robbed and sacked, their walls and houses leveled to the earth." - Pagans in the promised Land by Steven T. Newcomb Indigenous Law Institute and author of "Pagans in the Promised Land."
"It was with reluctance that the Timpanogos Indians who met the Higbee colony in March, 1848, permitted the first white settlement on Provo River, and that, too, in spite of the invitation previously extended to the colonists by the chiefs, Sowiette and Walker, to settle among their tribes and teach them how to become civilized. It has also been stated that soon after Fort Utah was founded, Walker, according to Colonel Bridger and Mr. Vasquez began stirring up the Indians against the "Mormon" settlers. In this movement Walker was aided by another chief named Pareyarts , variously styled Elk, Big Elk, Old Elk, etc., like himself a hater of the whites, and apparently quite as fond of fighting. It was with Big Elk and his band that the Provo settlers, in their first regular battle with the savages, had immediately to deal. Moreover, measles had begun to spread epidemically among the
Natives, and the saints had succeeded in driving most of the Timpanogos
from the valley into the nearby mountains. On a cold winter day
came to the fort asking for medicine for his people who were sick
from the disease. A soldier took the chief by the nap of his neck
and threw him out of the fort. Pareyarts was also of the same
royal bloodline as Walkara.
It was believed by Governor Young that Colonel Bridger and other mountaineers were at the bottom of much of the ill-feeling manifested by the red men, and they were incited to attack the "Mormon" settlements. The Governor, (Brigham Young), however, seemed to have confidence in Mr. Vasquez, who had opened a small store in Salt Lake City, and whose interests to that extent were identified with those of the settlers.
The Indians, at first so friendly with the Utah Valley colonists, began their depredations in that vicinity in the spring of 1849. Grain was stolen from the fields, cattle and horses from the herds, and now and then an arrow from an Indian bow would fall uncomfortably near some settler as he was out gathering fuel in the river bottoms." - Peter Gottfredson/Indian Depredations In Utah
So it followed that war with the Mormons began in earnest on February 28, 1849 with the first of six massacres at Battle Creek in the foothills above Pleasant Grove, Utah. In the crisp morning air, on that cold February morning, shots echoed off the canyon walls. There lingered a thick gray cloud of gun powder; the frozen snow was now crimson red with fresh innocent Native blood. This day would mark the beginning of a 21 year battle with Mormons, the US Government, and the Timpanogos Indian Nation. (See How The Black Hawk War Began)
A company of 35 Mormon militia,
under the leadership of Captain John Scott, left Salt Lake City in
pursuit of a so called “renegade band of Indians” who were falsely accused of taking horses belonging to Mormon leader Brigham Young.
When they were within a few miles north of the Provo River they were
stopped by An-kar-tewets, a warrior of the Timpanogos, who stood
before the men telling them to go back where they came from, that
they were not going to make any settlement on their land. Allegedly
they argued for sometime, until Dimmick pleaded with An-kar-tewets
that they wanted to live in peace with the Timpanogos and made promises of
gifts. According to the victors’ accounts following a long
discussion, An-kar-tewets made Dimmick raise his hand to swear to
the sun that no harm would come to the Timpanogos, that they would never
take away their lands or rights, and Dimmick and the others swore.
According to reliable accounts, Brigham gave the order for Capt. Scott "to take such measures as would put a final end to their depredations in future." But, before morning they received orders from Salt Lake City stating that "the horses were not stolen..." Three times the company had received word the Indian's had not stolen Brigham Young's horses, they had only been moved to a different location to pasture." Still, not one of the thirty-five men turned back. (Source: Stout Diary)
Scott, under orders from Brigham Young, he and
his men met up with a Shoshoni Indian they referred to as Little Chief on the
Provo River. Little Chief regretfully led Scott to an encampment of Timpanogos Indians who
allegedly had been doing some stealing. Moreover, it seems unlikely Little Chief would have betrayed his people in this way, more likely threatened, he gave in. The trail took the company
of soldiers to the mouth of a canyon above Pleasant Grove. Scott and his men split into four groups and
surrounded the camp, and opened fire on the unsuspecting people
sleeping there in their teepees.
It is said that the "battle" continued for a couple hours, perhaps, highly unlikely since most took shelter and were trapped in a nearby ravine, standing in freezing water, and they had only one gun, while the surrounding army pelted their victims with rocks. As they immerged from cover unarmed, troops shot them repeatedly. A Timpanogos man named Kone, unarmed, was shot in the back as he came out of his teepee. A brave girl about the age of 16 emerged from cover and pleaded with Capt. Scott not to harm her brother. Scott ordered her to bring her brother to him. Terrified of Scott she brought from the thicket her younger brother who bravely stood face to face with Scott and said, "Go away, what are you here for? Go away... you kill my father, my brother... for what? Go away, let us alone."
"Joshua Terry, a pioneer of 1847, and a mountain man who married into an Indian tribe, once told the writer (Howard R. Driggs) that this Indian boy became the warring leader Black Hawk. When peace came, after the Black Hawk War of the later eighteen sixties, this Chief, Terry declared, told him that he was this same boy taken after the fight on Battle Creek. He could never understand why the white men had shot down his people. It put bitterness in his heart; and though he lived for some time with the white people, his mind was ever set on avenging the wrong. That is why he later made war against them." (Story of Old Battle Creek and Pleasant Grove, Utah, Howard R. Driggs, 1948)
In 1853 Timpanogos leader Walkara (Black Hawk's uncle) told interpreter M. S. Martenas, "He (Walkara) said that he had always been opposed to the whites set[t]ling on the Indian lands, particularly that portion which he claims; and on which his band resides and on which they have resided since his childhood, and his parents before him—that the Mormons when they first commenced the settlement of Salt Lake Valley, was friendly, and promised them many comforts, and lasting friendship—that they continued friendly for a short time, until they became strong in numbers, then their conduct and treatment towards the Indians changed—they were not only treated unkindly, but many were much abused and this course has been pursued up to the present—sometimes they have been treated with much severity—they have been driven by this population from place to place—settlements have been made on all their hunting grounds in the valleys, and the graves of their fathers have been torn up by the whites." - STATEMENT, M. S. MARTENAS, INTERPRETER Great Salt Lake City, July 6 1853 Brigham Young Papers, MS 1234, Box 58, Folder 14 LDS Archives - Will Bagley Transcription
1855, January 29th, by now peoples of the Timpanogos Tribe had scattered in every direction no longer centrally located in Timpanogos Valley (Utah Valley). Walkara, a patriot, who had long defended his people and land, died at Meadow Creek, in Millard County. He was succeeded by his brother "Jake" Arropeen. Among his final words he admonished his tribe to live at peace with the settlers and not molest them. Scholars told me there is proof Wakara was poisoned to death. (See Wakara's history)
Within the twelve years that followed Brigham's militia in hand with U.S. Troops would commit the most hideous massacres in American history at Bear River, Circleville, Grass Valley, and Fort Utah. (See Videos)
The Man Mormons Called "Black Hawk"